-
What am I doing?
-
Where am I?
-
Friends
- 404
- Adriana Gascoigne
- AJ Vaynerchuk
- Alexis Gallisá
- Alison Rosen
- Andrei Zmievski
- Ariel Waldman
- Arquay Harris
- Aubrey Sabala
- Bernadetta Balla
- Brian Sewell
- Cal Henderson
- Calley Nye
- Carl Harris
- Chris Messina
- Cyan Banister
- Daniel Burka
- Daniel Ha
- Emily Chang
- Halle Tecco
- Jeffrey Zeldman
- Jeremy Lwanga
- Joe Hewitt
- John Potter
- Josh Chandler
- Joshua Campoverde
- Karen Ngyuen
- Kevin Cupp
- Kyle Shank
- Leah Culver
- Leo Laporte
- Loic LeMeur
- Marc Mendell
- Matt Galligan
- Matthew Gioiosi
- Matthew Martz
- Mike Arrington
- Mike Malone
- Natali Del Conte
- Nate Westheimer
- Neha Tiwari
- Nick Starr
- Richard Crowley
- Robert Balousek
- Ryan Powell
- Scott Parsons
- Terry Chay
- Tim Moynihan
- Tom Merritt
- Veronica Belmont
- Viva Tung
- Wilson Tang
-
Archives
- March 2011
- November 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- August 2006
-
Blogroll
- 404
- Alison Rosen
- Matthew Gioiosi
-
RSS Feeds
- All posts
- All comments
-
Meta
Pownce stands for participation
I was listening to Leo Laporte and John C. Dvorak argue about the difference between Pownce and Twitter. Guys, THEY ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT! Twitter simply asks, "What are you doing?"
Pownce doesn't ask you any questions. Instead, it feels like a comfortable, social web app. Yea, it looks like Twitter, but you can choose different media types, and they have this revolutionary thing called commenting.
I know that you can "at" or "D" people on Twitter, but interacting with a tweet isn't as elegant as this:
I can't ever see myself leaving Twitter though. It kinda reminds me of MySpace. I am kinda ashamed to be using a web application built on faulty software, but the community is there. Twitter is successful because it's right here, right now. It's simply about your friend's status, and it's much easier to digest. Pownce takes more effort, but your experience is richer. So-called "micro-blogging" excites me, and I want to know how it will evolve. The web community that can figure out a way to aggregate everyone's social data into one easy-to-digest format will survive the upcoming web 2.0 bust. Could it be Friendfeed, Iminta, Jaiku, ? Personally, I think it must integrate email. That's why Google has the leg up on everybody. Oh, and they already have a . Pownce is doing a good job of luring me in a few times a day. It's more fun that Twitter because it involves my initiative to click through to videos, browse someone's photos, or listen to my friend's favorite songs. Twitter just gives me a tinyURL. Which social network do you enjoy most? Which one do you look forward to participating in?
-
Cindy
-
Cindy
-
http://geekynano.wordpress.com/ Rafy
-
http://geekynano.wordpress.com/ Rafy
-
Mark Bate
-
Mark Bate
-
https://andrewmager.com Andrew Mager
-
https://andrewmager.com Andrew Mager
-
https://andrewmager.com/2008/05/28/pownce-has-an-aim-bot/ Pownce has an AIM bot — Andrew Mager
-
https://andrewmager.com/2008/06/13/this-is-not-what-twitter-is-for/ Andrew Mager » This is not what Twitter is for
-
http://www.goodxo.com Moncler
-
http://www.roout.com GHD